MGT602 Business Decision Analytics

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MGT602 Business Decision Analytics
Assessment Decision Style Analysis Reflective report
Individual/Group Individual
Length Up to 1000 words
Learning Outcomes a) Select and evaluate the usefulness of a range of decision making
tools and reflect on your decision-making styles and contrast
with other styles to determine the respective levels of
rationality and intuition utilised
b) Compare, contrast and critically evaluate sources of data as
influences for decision-making in a range of business contexts
Submission For regular class (12 Weeks Duration):
By 11:59 pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 2.2 (week 4)
For intensive class (6 Weeks Duration):
Part A: By 11:59 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 2.2 (week 2)
Weighting 20%
Total Marks 20 marks

Context:
Fast changing workplaces call for greater flexibility in the ways individuals and work teams make and
implement decisions. Alongside the increasing rate of change are the demands for better decision
making through understanding and mitigating personal preferences and biases.
This assessment has been designed to:
▪ Appraise your ability to research academic literature on decision making. You are expected
to utilise the literature provided in Modules 1 and 2 as a foundation that guides your
further academic research.
▪ Select and evaluate the usefulness of a range of decision-making tools and reflect on levels of
rationality and intuition utilised during the decision-making process.
▪ Compare, contrast and critically evaluate sources of data as influences in the decision-making
context
▪ Identify the relevant sources of influence and limitations in your decision-decision making process
MGT602 Assessment 1 writing guidelines:
This assessment draws on learning activities and resources from weeks 1-4 and Modules 1 and 2. It is
designed for you to engage in the decision-making process and then reflectively analyse your decisionmaking process using only theories and concepts from the Business Decision Analytics course (MGT602).
You should include in your reflective report:
▪ The decision-making problem detailed by your learning facilitator
▪ Analysis of your decision-making preferences (see activity Module 1)
▪ Analysis and influence of your personality traits and the impact on your decision-making
▪ Details of the sources of data collected during the decision-making process and how this data
was evaluated/analysed
▪ Analysis of the decision-making process using the rational decision-making model
▪ Application of bounded rationality to identify the limitations in your decision-making
▪ Visual interpretation of data / trends/ patterns
▪ As a reflective analysis you will present your analysis in the first person.
Submission format
Cover Sheet: Every assessment must have a Torrens University Coversheet. (The Assignment Cover
Sheet found in: https://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms)
1. Introduction: 100 words maximum. The introduction will present the reader with a clear and
concise understanding of the following: 1. What is the submission about; 2. What theories will be
used; 3 Your concise conclusion; and 4 The structure of the submission
2. Analysis and evaluation: 800 words maximum. In this section you will analyse and evaluate your
decision-making process using selected theories and concepts from the various Modules offered
in Blackboard for this subject. You will include any blind spots or biases that you have identified in
making this evaluative decision
3. Conclusion: 100 words maximum. In this section you will provide a concise summation of your
analysis and conclusion(s).
4. References: A minimum of 4 academic references are required from seminal sources and books.
Referencing must be APA style. For referencing information refer to:
http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
5. Appendix: If required.
6. NOTE: This submission is to be presented as a report. Any tables prepared must be identified
and discussed in the text/body and included in an appendix.
MGT602 Assessment 1 Submission Process
▪ Please make sure to submit your MGT602 Assessment 1 via Blackboard and the Assessments Tab by
End of Module 2.2 (Friday of Week 4).
▪ There is NO need to insert Table of Contents and Executive Summary.
▪ Please make sure to submit ONE Microsoft WORD Document (.doc OR .docx). PDF Submissions will
NOT be accepted.
▪ Please make sure to insert page numbers.
▪ The Assignment Cover Sheet is available at (https://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms) and
must be inserted at the beginning of the assessment document.
▪ You may identify each section with the headings of. 1. Introduction, 2. Analysis and Evaluation, 3.
Conclusion, 4. References, 5 Appendix).
▪ The Cover Sheet and References are not included in the word count. Nor is the appendix
▪ Only APA style is used for citing and referencing research. More information on referencing here
http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
▪ Please make sure to review the provided marking rubric at the end of this document for your
information.
Notes to Learning Facilitator and student:
Each student needs to select one topic from a range that will be provided by the Learning Facilitator in
week 2. It is the student’s responsibility to read the options provided and make an appropriate choice
based on interest or prior knowledge.
The student is required to assume the role of undertaking this decision for themselves and evaluate the
decision based on the criteria listed above (eg blind spots, biases, decision models utilized etc) and any
further relevant sources gained from Modules 1 and 2 on Blackboard.

Assessment Criteria Fail (Unacceptable)
0-49%
Pass (Functional)
50-64%
Credit (Proficient)
65-74%
Distinction (Advanced) 75 –
84%
High Distinction (Exceptional)
85-100%
1. Reflect on a range of
personal daily decisions
and one major decision to
analyse and evaluate
sources of data, decision
making style and decision
making tools. (25% -5/20)
Little or no authentic
personal reflection on
daily decisions or major
decision. No, or limited
analysis or evaluation of
sources of data input,
decision-making styles and
tools.
Some personal reflection
on daily decision-making
and major decision-making
is evident, with reference
to at least two sources of
data, decision-making
styles and tools.
A clearly authentic
personal reflection on
daily decision-making and
major decision-making is
evident, with clear analysis
and evaluation of at least
two sources of data,
decision-making styles and
tools.
Comprehensive reflection
on daily decision-making
and major decision-making
is evident, with clear
analysis and evaluation of
at least three sources of
data, decision-making
styles and tools.
Comprehensive and
sophisticated reflection on
daily decision-making and
major decision-making is
evident, with explicit analysis
and evaluation of multiple
sources of data, decision
making styles and tools.
2. Compare and contrast
with other decision
making styles and
processes to identify bias
and blind spots (25% –
5/20)
Little or no evidence of
discussions and feedback
from classmates about
bias and blind spots or
comparison with other
decision-making styles
Some evidence of
discussion with two
classmates and
comparative analysis of
decision-making styles and
the implication of bias and
blind spots for own
decision-making.
Clear evidence of
discussion with at least
two classmates and
comparative analysis of
decision-making styles and
the implication of bias and
blind spots for own
decision-making.
Comprehensive evidence
of discussion with at least
three classmates and
comparative analysis of
decision-making styles and
the implication of bias and
blind spots for own
decision-making
Sophisticated analysis and
comparison of decision
making styles and the
implication of bias and blind
spots for decision making.
Feedback from at least three
classmates is discussed with
recommendations to enhance
own decision-making
3.Prepare a business style
report with clear headings
and visual interpretation
and presentation of data
trends/ patterns (25%- 10
marks)
Report lacks logical
coherence and clear
structure Limited data
analysis and no visual
representation of data.
Report has basic logical
flow and structure. Basic
concepts and analysis are
explained Attempts basic
visual representation of
data
Report has a clear logical
flow and structure. Clear
expression of concepts and
analysis. Adequate visual
representation of d
Report has a strong logical
flow and structure.
Accurate Executive
Summary. Conclusion
accurately captures key
learning. Clear visual
representation of data
trends/ patterns
Excellent logic and structure.
Concise, accurate Executive
Summary Conclusion
accurately captures deep
learning and insights. Creative
and engaging visual
representation of data trends/
patterns.
4.Support your argument
with relevant
contemporary literature
including major resources
from within the subject
modules. (25%- 10 marks)
No, or few references from
within subject learning
resources weeks 1-4
(modules 1-2) Many errors
in text citations and
reference list according to
APA referencing guidelines
Makes some attempt to
use relevant references
from within subject
learning resources. Several
major and minor errors in
text citations and
reference list according to
APA referencing
guidelines.
References support an
adequate argument and
application of major
concepts from within
subject learning resources
weeks 1-4 (modules 1-2).
Several minor errors in
text citations and
reference list according to
APA referencing
References support a
mostly comprehensive
argument and application
of major concepts from
within subject learning
resources weeks 1-4
(modules 1-2). Strong level
of accuracy of in-text
citations and reference list
according to APA style
Sophisticated references
support comprehensive
argument and application of
major concepts from within
subject learning resources
weeks 1-4 (modules 1-2 and
beyond). High level of
accuracy of in-text citations
and reference list according to
APA style guidelines.

Grading Rubric Assessment 1. Weighting 20%

guidelines. guidelines.
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Why Choose Us?

  • 100% non-plagiarized Papers
  • 24/7 /365 Service Available
  • Affordable Prices
  • Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
  • Will complete your papers in 6 hours
  • On-time Delivery
  • Money-back and Privacy guarantees
  • Unlimited Amendments upon request
  • Satisfaction guarantee
SATISFACTION

How It Works

  • Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
  • Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

About AcademicWritersBay.com

AcademicWritersBay.com is an easy-to-use and reliable service that is ready to assist you with your papers 24/7/ 365days a year. 99% of our customers are happy with their papers. Our team is efficient and will always tackle your essay needs comprehensively assuring you of excellent results. Feel free to ask them anything concerning your essay demands or Order.

AcademicWritersBay.com is a private company that offers academic support and assistance to students at all levels. Our mission is to provide proficient and high quality academic services to our highly esteemed clients. AcademicWritersBay.com is equipped with competent and proficient writers to tackle all types of your academic needs, and provide you with excellent results. Most of our writers are holders of master’s degrees or PhDs, which is an surety of excellent results to our clients. We provide assistance to students all over the world.
We provide high quality term papers, research papers, essays, proposals, theses and many others. At AcademicWritersBay.com, you can be sure of excellent grades in your assignments and final exams.

NO PLAGIARISM

error: Content is protected !!