FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay
ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF | |
Subject Code and Title | MGT602 Business Decision Analytics |
Assessment | Decision Style Analysis Reflective report |
Individual/Group | Individual |
Length | Up to 1000 words |
Learning Outcomes | a) Select and evaluate the usefulness of a range of decision making tools and reflect on your decision-making styles and contrast with other styles to determine the respective levels of rationality and intuition utilised b) Compare, contrast and critically evaluate sources of data as influences for decision-making in a range of business contexts |
Submission | For regular class (12 Weeks Duration): By 11:59 pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 2.2 (week 4) For intensive class (6 Weeks Duration): Part A: By 11:59 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 2.2 (week 2) |
Weighting | 20% |
Total Marks | 20 marks |
Context:
Fast changing workplaces call for greater flexibility in the ways individuals and work teams make and
implement decisions. Alongside the increasing rate of change are the demands for better decision
making through understanding and mitigating personal preferences and biases.
This assessment has been designed to:
▪ Appraise your ability to research academic literature on decision making. You are expected
to utilise the literature provided in Modules 1 and 2 as a foundation that guides your
further academic research.
▪ Select and evaluate the usefulness of a range of decision-making tools and reflect on levels of
rationality and intuition utilised during the decision-making process.
▪ Compare, contrast and critically evaluate sources of data as influences in the decision-making
context
▪ Identify the relevant sources of influence and limitations in your decision-decision making process
MGT602 Assessment 1 writing guidelines:
This assessment draws on learning activities and resources from weeks 1-4 and Modules 1 and 2. It is
designed for you to engage in the decision-making process and then reflectively analyse your decisionmaking process using only theories and concepts from the Business Decision Analytics course (MGT602).
You should include in your reflective report:
▪ The decision-making problem detailed by your learning facilitator
▪ Analysis of your decision-making preferences (see activity Module 1)
▪ Analysis and influence of your personality traits and the impact on your decision-making
▪ Details of the sources of data collected during the decision-making process and how this data
was evaluated/analysed
▪ Analysis of the decision-making process using the rational decision-making model
▪ Application of bounded rationality to identify the limitations in your decision-making
▪ Visual interpretation of data / trends/ patterns
▪ As a reflective analysis you will present your analysis in the first person.
Submission format
Cover Sheet: Every assessment must have a Torrens University Coversheet. (The Assignment Cover
Sheet found in: https://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms)
1. Introduction: 100 words maximum. The introduction will present the reader with a clear and
concise understanding of the following: 1. What is the submission about; 2. What theories will be
used; 3 Your concise conclusion; and 4 The structure of the submission
2. Analysis and evaluation: 800 words maximum. In this section you will analyse and evaluate your
decision-making process using selected theories and concepts from the various Modules offered
in Blackboard for this subject. You will include any blind spots or biases that you have identified in
making this evaluative decision
3. Conclusion: 100 words maximum. In this section you will provide a concise summation of your
analysis and conclusion(s).
4. References: A minimum of 4 academic references are required from seminal sources and books.
Referencing must be APA style. For referencing information refer to:
http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
5. Appendix: If required.
6. NOTE: This submission is to be presented as a report. Any tables prepared must be identified
and discussed in the text/body and included in an appendix.
MGT602 Assessment 1 Submission Process
▪ Please make sure to submit your MGT602 Assessment 1 via Blackboard and the Assessments Tab by
End of Module 2.2 (Friday of Week 4).
▪ There is NO need to insert Table of Contents and Executive Summary.
▪ Please make sure to submit ONE Microsoft WORD Document (.doc OR .docx). PDF Submissions will
NOT be accepted.
▪ Please make sure to insert page numbers.
▪ The Assignment Cover Sheet is available at (https://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms) and
must be inserted at the beginning of the assessment document.
▪ You may identify each section with the headings of. 1. Introduction, 2. Analysis and Evaluation, 3.
Conclusion, 4. References, 5 Appendix).
▪ The Cover Sheet and References are not included in the word count. Nor is the appendix
▪ Only APA style is used for citing and referencing research. More information on referencing here
http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
▪ Please make sure to review the provided marking rubric at the end of this document for your
information.
Notes to Learning Facilitator and student:
Each student needs to select one topic from a range that will be provided by the Learning Facilitator in
week 2. It is the student’s responsibility to read the options provided and make an appropriate choice
based on interest or prior knowledge.
The student is required to assume the role of undertaking this decision for themselves and evaluate the
decision based on the criteria listed above (eg blind spots, biases, decision models utilized etc) and any
further relevant sources gained from Modules 1 and 2 on Blackboard.
Assessment Criteria | Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49% |
Pass (Functional) 50-64% |
Credit (Proficient) 65-74% |
Distinction (Advanced) 75 – 84% |
High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% |
1. Reflect on a range of personal daily decisions and one major decision to analyse and evaluate sources of data, decision making style and decision making tools. (25% -5/20) |
Little or no authentic personal reflection on daily decisions or major decision. No, or limited analysis or evaluation of sources of data input, decision-making styles and tools. |
Some personal reflection on daily decision-making and major decision-making is evident, with reference to at least two sources of data, decision-making styles and tools. |
A clearly authentic personal reflection on daily decision-making and major decision-making is evident, with clear analysis and evaluation of at least two sources of data, decision-making styles and tools. |
Comprehensive reflection on daily decision-making and major decision-making is evident, with clear analysis and evaluation of at least three sources of data, decision-making styles and tools. |
Comprehensive and sophisticated reflection on daily decision-making and major decision-making is evident, with explicit analysis and evaluation of multiple sources of data, decision making styles and tools. |
2. Compare and contrast with other decision making styles and processes to identify bias and blind spots (25% – 5/20) |
Little or no evidence of discussions and feedback from classmates about bias and blind spots or comparison with other decision-making styles |
Some evidence of discussion with two classmates and comparative analysis of decision-making styles and the implication of bias and blind spots for own decision-making. |
Clear evidence of discussion with at least two classmates and comparative analysis of decision-making styles and the implication of bias and blind spots for own decision-making. |
Comprehensive evidence of discussion with at least three classmates and comparative analysis of decision-making styles and the implication of bias and blind spots for own decision-making |
Sophisticated analysis and comparison of decision making styles and the implication of bias and blind spots for decision making. Feedback from at least three classmates is discussed with recommendations to enhance own decision-making |
3.Prepare a business style report with clear headings and visual interpretation and presentation of data trends/ patterns (25%- 10 marks) |
Report lacks logical coherence and clear structure Limited data analysis and no visual representation of data. |
Report has basic logical flow and structure. Basic concepts and analysis are explained Attempts basic visual representation of data |
Report has a clear logical flow and structure. Clear expression of concepts and analysis. Adequate visual representation of d |
Report has a strong logical flow and structure. Accurate Executive Summary. Conclusion accurately captures key learning. Clear visual representation of data trends/ patterns |
Excellent logic and structure. Concise, accurate Executive Summary Conclusion accurately captures deep learning and insights. Creative and engaging visual representation of data trends/ patterns. |
4.Support your argument with relevant contemporary literature including major resources from within the subject modules. (25%- 10 marks) |
No, or few references from within subject learning resources weeks 1-4 (modules 1-2) Many errors in text citations and reference list according to APA referencing guidelines |
Makes some attempt to use relevant references from within subject learning resources. Several major and minor errors in text citations and reference list according to APA referencing guidelines. |
References support an adequate argument and application of major concepts from within subject learning resources weeks 1-4 (modules 1-2). Several minor errors in text citations and reference list according to APA referencing |
References support a mostly comprehensive argument and application of major concepts from within subject learning resources weeks 1-4 (modules 1-2). Strong level of accuracy of in-text citations and reference list according to APA style |
Sophisticated references support comprehensive argument and application of major concepts from within subject learning resources weeks 1-4 (modules 1-2 and beyond). High level of accuracy of in-text citations and reference list according to APA style guidelines. |
Grading Rubric Assessment 1. Weighting 20%
guidelines. | guidelines. |
- WE OFFER THE BEST CUSTOM PAPER WRITING SERVICES. WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER
Why Choose Us?
- 100% non-plagiarized Papers
- 24/7 /365 Service Available
- Affordable Prices
- Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
- Will complete your papers in 6 hours
- On-time Delivery
- Money-back and Privacy guarantees
- Unlimited Amendments upon request
- Satisfaction guarantee
How It Works
- Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
- Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.
About AcademicWritersBay.com
AcademicWritersBay.com is an easy-to-use and reliable service that is ready to assist you with your papers 24/7/ 365days a year. 99% of our customers are happy with their papers. Our team is efficient and will always tackle your essay needs comprehensively assuring you of excellent results. Feel free to ask them anything concerning your essay demands or Order.
AcademicWritersBay.com is a private company that offers academic support and assistance to students at all levels. Our mission is to provide proficient and high quality academic services to our highly esteemed clients. AcademicWritersBay.com is equipped with competent and proficient writers to tackle all types of your academic needs, and provide you with excellent results. Most of our writers are holders of master’s degrees or PhDs, which is an surety of excellent results to our clients. We provide assistance to students all over the world.
We provide high quality term papers, research papers, essays, proposals, theses and many others. At AcademicWritersBay.com, you can be sure of excellent grades in your assignments and final exams.