OCC Differences in HCS between US British & Canadian Systems Paper

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

Reading Research Literature, health and medicine homework help

Reading Research Literature, health and medicine homework help
Skip To ContentDashboard Account DashboardReading Research Literature GuidelinesUpdated 7/6/2017PurposeThe student will read research literature to determine the research purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data collection and analysis.Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO4 and 8)CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO4 and 8)Points: This assignment is worth 225 points.Due Date: Submit the completed Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.Requirements1. Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library.Retrieve the following research articles: Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions.Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R., Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017). Quantitative balance and gait measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A pilot study. Indian Journal Of Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132. http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http:/… (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: A qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1 http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http:/… (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.2. Download the Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..3. Watch the video on how to complete this assignment at http://www.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.4. Type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your form does NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences.5. Please post questions about this assignment to the Q & A Forum.6. Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form_Smith.docx.7. Submit the completed form by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.RubricNR439_Reading_Research_LiteratureNR439_Reading_Research_LiteratureCriteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVelayutham, et al article: Question 1 Purposeview longer descriptionCorrectly identifies the purpose of the research article.10.0 pts Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article9.0 pts Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.8.0 pts Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it.4.0 pts Does not identify any purpose for the research.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 2 Research Questionview longer descriptionCorrectly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.10.0 pts Mostly identifies the research question that the author described.9.0 pts Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described.8.0 pts Offers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it.4.0 pts Does not identify any research question.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 3 Research Designview longer descriptionCorrectly describes the research design of the study.10.0 pts Mostly describes the research design of the study.9.0 pts Somewhat describes the research design of the study.8.0 pts Offers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it.4.0 pts Does not identify any research design.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 4 Populationview longer descriptionCorrectly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.10.0 pts Mostly describes identifies and describes the population of the research article.9.0 pts Somewhat identifies and describes the population of the research article.8.0 pts Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article.4.0 pts Does not identify any population.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 5 Sampleview longer descriptionCorrectly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate.10.0 pts Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate.9.0 pts Correctly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate.8.0 pts Misidentifies the sampling approach.4.0 pts Doesn’t explain any sampling approach.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 6 Data Collectionview longer descriptionCorrectly describes the data collection procedure in detail.10.0 pts Correctly describes the data collection procedure in general.9.0 pts Correctly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it.8.0 pts Incorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information.4.0 pts Does not describe any data collection procedures.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 7 Data Analysisview longer descriptionCorrectly describes how the all of the data were analyzed.10.0 pts Correctly describes how most of the data were analyzed.9.0 pts Describes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation.8.0 pts Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information.4.0 pts Does not describe how data were analyzed.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 8 Limitationsview longer descriptionCorrectly describes all of the limitations in the study.10.0 pts Correctly describes most of the limitations in the study.9.0 pts Correctly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two.8.0 pts Minimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them.4.0 pts Does not describe any limitations for the study.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 9 Conclusionsview longer descriptionCorrectly describes all of the authors’ conclusions.10.0 pts Correctly describes most of the authors’ conclusions.9.0 pts Correctly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two.8.0 pts Minimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them.4.0 pts Does not describe any author conclusions.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 10 Advances Knowledgeview longer descriptionDescribes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field.10.0 pts Generally, describes how this research advances knowledge.9.0 pts Briefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.8.0 pts Incorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.4.0 pts Does not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePals et al article: Question 11 Purposeview longer descriptionCorrectly identifies the purpose of the research article.10.0 pts Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article9.0 pts Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.8.0 pts Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it.4.0 pts Does not identify any purpose for the research.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 12 Research Questionview longer descriptionCorrectly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.10.0 pts Mostly identifies the research question that the author described.9.0 pts Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described.8.0 pts Offers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it.4.0 pts Does not identify any research question.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 13 Research Designview longer descriptionCorrectly describes the research design of the study.10.0 pts Mostly describes the research design of the study.9.0 pts Somewhat describes the research design of the study.8.0 pts Offers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it.4.0 pts Does not identify any research design.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 14 Populationview longer descriptionCorrectly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.10.0 pts Mostly describes identifies and describes the population of the research article.9.0 pts Somewhat identifies and describes the population of the research article.8.0 pts Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article.4.0 pts Does not identify any population.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 15 Sampleview longer descriptionCorrectly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate.10.0 pts Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate.9.0 pts Correctly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate.8.0 pts Misidentifies the sampling approach.4.0 pts Doesn’t explain any sampling approach.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 16 Data Collectionview longer descriptionCorrectly describes the data collection procedure in detail.10.0 pts Correctly describes the data collection procedure in general.9.0 pts Correctly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it.8.0 pts Incorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information.4.0 pts Does not describe any data collection procedures.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 17 Data Analysisview longer descriptionCorrectly describes how the all of the data were analyzed.10.0 pts Correctly describes how most of the data were analyzed.9.0 pts Describes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation.8.0 pts Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information.4.0 pts Does not describe how data were analyzed.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 18 Limitationsview longer descriptionCorrectly describes all of the limitations in the study.10.0 pts Correctly describes most of the limitations in the study.9.0 pts Correctly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two.8.0 pts Minimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them.4.0 pts Does not describe any limitations for the study.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 19 Conclusionsview longer descriptionCorrectly describes all of the authors’ conclusions.10.0 pts Correctly describes most of the authors’ conclusions.9.0 pts Correctly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two.8.0 pts Minimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them.4.0 pts Does not describe any author conclusions.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 20 Advances Knowledgeview longer descriptionDescribes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field.10.0 pts Generally, describes how this research advances knowledge.9.0 pts Briefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.8.0 pts Incorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.4.0 pts Does not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field.0.0 pts 10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle and Writingview longer descriptionCorrectly names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.25.0 pts One to four errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.22.0 pts Five to eight errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.20.0 pts Nine to twelve errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax10.0 pts Thirteen or more errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.0.0 pts 25.0 ptsTotal Points: 225.0PreviousNextTop

Health Insurance and Quality, health and medicine homework help

Health Insurance and Quality, health and medicine homework help
Imagine that you are the clinic manager of an urgent care center. Recently, your center has seen an increase in complaints regarding long wait times, inadequate or incomplete information from staff during visits, and the relatively small number of insurance types accepted at the facility.Write a 2-3 page paper in which you:Examine at least three (3) examples of quality initiatives that could increase patient satisfaction and potentially reduce healthcare cost. Support your response with examples of the successful application your chosen quality initiatives.Defend your position on the decision to accept Medicare or Medicaid as potential pay sources for your urgent care center. Provide support with at least two (2) examples that illustrate your position.Use at least two (2) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Why Choose Us?

  • 100% non-plagiarized Papers
  • 24/7 /365 Service Available
  • Affordable Prices
  • Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
  • Will complete your papers in 6 hours
  • On-time Delivery
  • Money-back and Privacy guarantees
  • Unlimited Amendments upon request
  • Satisfaction guarantee
SATISFACTION

How It Works

  • Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
  • Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

About AcademicWritersBay.com

AcademicWritersBay.com is an easy-to-use and reliable service that is ready to assist you with your papers 24/7/ 365days a year. 99% of our customers are happy with their papers. Our team is efficient and will always tackle your essay needs comprehensively assuring you of excellent results. Feel free to ask them anything concerning your essay demands or Order.

AcademicWritersBay.com is a private company that offers academic support and assistance to students at all levels. Our mission is to provide proficient and high quality academic services to our highly esteemed clients. AcademicWritersBay.com is equipped with competent and proficient writers to tackle all types of your academic needs, and provide you with excellent results. Most of our writers are holders of master’s degrees or PhDs, which is an surety of excellent results to our clients. We provide assistance to students all over the world.
We provide high quality term papers, research papers, essays, proposals, theses and many others. At AcademicWritersBay.com, you can be sure of excellent grades in your assignments and final exams.

NO PLAGIARISM

error: Content is protected !!