– Week7.docx

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

Throughout this course, you have analyzed your current work environment to identify the acquiring, developing, and training practices. Employees are the biggest asset and contribute to the culture and overall performance of the organization. This project requires you to determine how to leverage the human capital within your organization. Use the research you have complied throughout this course to determine how to appropriately develop and motivate your employees.

Develop a written proposal (1,000-1,250 words), discussing performance indicators, rewards and incentives, and a plan for motivating employees. Your proposal must include the following:

· Describe tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall employee performance on the job.

· How will you identify an employee’s strengths and skills to leverage their performance?

· Develop strategies to improve employee performance. How will you provide employees with rewards and incentives for performance improvement?

· How will you integrate rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain the employees?

· Describe a vision for the overall culture you aspire to develop in your organization, relative to the employees being the biggest asset.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. 

Rubric

Tasks and Performance Indicators assessment

Tasks and Performance Indicators

16.5 points

Criteria Description

Tasks and Performance Indicators

5. Excellent

16.5 points

A comprehensive description of the tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall employee performance is included.

4. Good

14.36 points

A clear description of the tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall employee performance is included.

3. Satisfactory

13.04 points

A description of the tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall employee performance is included and minimally describes the tasks and performance of employees. 

2. Less than Satisfactory

12.21 points

The written proposal does not include a description of tasks and performance indicators. 

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall employee performance is included but is incomplete or lacks details. 

collapse Identifying Employee Strengths and Skills to Leverage Performance assessment

Identifying Employee Strengths and Skills to Leverage Performance

16.5 points

Criteria Description

Identifying Employee Strengths and Skills to Leverage Performance

5. Excellent

16.5 points

There is a well-developed description of leveraging on employee strengths and skills to improve performance. 

4. Good

14.36 points

There is a detailed description of leveraging on employee strengths and skills to improve performance. 

3. Satisfactory

13.04 points

There is some description of leveraging on employee strengths and skills to improve performance. 

2. Less than Satisfactory

12.21 points

The written proposal includes a description of leveraging on employee strengths and skills but the description is incomplete or lacks details. 

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The written proposal does not include leveraging on human capital. 

collapse Strategies to Improve Performance assessment

Strategies to Improve Performance 

16.5 points

Criteria Description

Strategies to Improve Performance 

5. Excellent

16.5 points

The written proposal includes a comprehensive description of strategies to improve employee performance and thoroughly discusses rewards and incentives for performance improvement. 

4. Good

14.36 points

The written proposal includes strategies to improve employee performance and discusses rewards and incentives for performance improvement. 

3. Satisfactory

13.04 points

The written proposal includes a detailed description of strategies to improve employee performance and adequately discusses rewards and incentives for performance improvement. 

2. Less than Satisfactory

12.21 points

The written proposal includes strategies to improve employee performance but they are incomplete or lack details. 

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The written proposal does not include strategies to improve employee performance.

collapse Integration of Rewards and Incentives to Remain Competitive assessment

Integration of Rewards and Incentives to Remain Competitive

16.5 points

Criteria Description

Integration of Rewards and Incentives to Remain Competitive

5. Excellent

16.5 points

The written proposal includes a clear description of the integration of rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain employees.

4. Good

14.36 points

The written proposal includes an appropriate description of the integration of rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain employees.

3. Satisfactory

13.04 points

The written proposal includes a vague description of the integration of rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain employees.

2. Less than Satisfactory

12.21 points

The written proposal includes a thorough description of the integration of rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain employees.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The written proposal does not include a description of the integration of rewards and incentives to remain competitive. 

collapse Culture Within the Organization assessment

Culture Within the Organization

11 points

Criteria Description

Culture Within the Organization

5. Excellent

11 points

There is a well-developed description of the aspired culture within the organization relative to the employees being the biggest asset. 

4. Good

9.57 points

There is a detailed description of the aspired culture within the organization relative to the employees being the biggest asset. 

3. Satisfactory

8.69 points

There is some description of the aspired culture within the organization relative to the employees being the biggest asset.

2. Less than Satisfactory

8.14 points

The written proposal includes a description of the culture within the organization but is incomplete or lacks details. 

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The written proposal does not include a description of the culture within the organization. 

collapse Thesis Development and Purpose assessment

Thesis Development and Purpose

7.7 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent

7.7 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

4. Good

6.7 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

3. Satisfactory

6.08 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.7 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

collapse Argument Logic and Construction assessment

Argument Logic and Construction

8.8 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent

8.8 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good

7.66 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory

6.95 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. 

2. Less than Satisfactory

6.51 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

collapse Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) assessment

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

5.5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

4.79 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory

4.35 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less than Satisfactory

4.07 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

collapse Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) assessment

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5.5 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent

5.5 points

All format elements are correct. 

4. Good

4.79 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Satisfactory

4.35 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. 

2. Less than Satisfactory

4.07 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

collapse Documentation of Sources assessment

Documentation of Sources 

5.5 points

Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Why Choose Us?

  • 100% non-plagiarized Papers
  • 24/7 /365 Service Available
  • Affordable Prices
  • Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
  • Will complete your papers in 6 hours
  • On-time Delivery
  • Money-back and Privacy guarantees
  • Unlimited Amendments upon request
  • Satisfaction guarantee
SATISFACTION

How It Works

  • Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
  • Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

About AcademicWritersBay.com

AcademicWritersBay.com is an easy-to-use and reliable service that is ready to assist you with your papers 24/7/ 365days a year. 99% of our customers are happy with their papers. Our team is efficient and will always tackle your essay needs comprehensively assuring you of excellent results. Feel free to ask them anything concerning your essay demands or Order.

AcademicWritersBay.com is a private company that offers academic support and assistance to students at all levels. Our mission is to provide proficient and high quality academic services to our highly esteemed clients. AcademicWritersBay.com is equipped with competent and proficient writers to tackle all types of your academic needs, and provide you with excellent results. Most of our writers are holders of master’s degrees or PhDs, which is an surety of excellent results to our clients. We provide assistance to students all over the world.
We provide high quality term papers, research papers, essays, proposals, theses and many others. At AcademicWritersBay.com, you can be sure of excellent grades in your assignments and final exams.

NO PLAGIARISM

error: Content is protected !!